The Fisher King (1991)
#1
Tonight, at the mysterious behest of my partner, I retrieved my DVD of The Fisher King from the uncatalogued depths of the abandoned wardrobe come retro styled video library that houses my treasured collection.

We saw this film together on its initial theatrical release at the grand (now long gone) Curzon Movie Palace, Belfast on a rainy Saturday night.

Terry Gilliam was my favourite film director then. I'm posting on a (THE) Terry Gilliam fanzine so I obviously continue to hold his work in very high esteem but hopefully I have a broader and more reasoned appreciation of cinema and filmmaking but back then Terry was the alpha & omega.

The film hit me hard that night. It was something different from the Man. Perhaps I was nostalgically craving a flight of fancy to elevate me from my woes but the film came to me as a sort of reckoning.The Fisher King's themes of disillusionment and the quest for redemption chimed profoundly with my personal situation. The cavernous, psychological depths of that Gotham cityscape were not unfamiliar territory. 

On my return to this grubby, romantic world, I was struck by the power and commitment of the performances.  Terry brilliantly orchestrates an ever shifting mis-en-scene that dramatically and sympathetically mirrors the ensembles transforming viewpoints and intertwining arcs with his unique, heightened density of vision but this film lives with a fiery, relatable human passion.

I could expound at length about all the four main leads all of whom articulate their positions with humour, personal insight, robust physicality and a sense of jeopardy but Robin William's graces his embodiment of Perry with a raw, enigmatic vulnerability that transcends into something magical and at its crescendo a little heartbreaking.

It seems to me now a very atypical film for the time of its production and one that still flares with tremendous sparks from the unique meeting of the real with the fantastique.
  Reply
#2
Fisher King is also a sort of enigma for me... I wonder if it's "a very atypical film for the time" because its intrinsic nature or because of how Gilliam looks at it... It could be inches away from a romantic comedy with Tom Hanks and Michelle Pfeiffer or something but it's how Gilliam makes all the rough edges pop that gives it its purpose and meaning I think. Just the flashback of the murder of Parry's wife is incredibly graphic and is an image engraved in your mind when you think of the film... And I made sure to check, it's not in Lagravenese's script, which is more allusive :
[Image: fisher1.jpg]
[Image: fisher2.jpg]
It's a romantic film viewed through an unromantic lens, to some extent. The beauty of it is that it's not just Gilliam trolling the script, it's him reacting to it on a deep level, wishing to avoid cliché to find an emotional (and mythological) truth...
  Reply
#3
I think you’ve made some astute observations, there. It is an unusual mix of elements and in lesser hands it could have been much more prosaic or not worked at all. I guess the film gods were with this one. ?
  Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)