Hm. Comparing the official, 9-minutes highlights video from the conference (
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl...xhTaaIDDPI ) to that complete version uploaded by one radio station and linked in my last post.
The camera operator for the short official video is obviously better, but the sound on both versions is not that good. Both are noisy, and the short official video obviously takes its sound from a regular camera mic recording what the PAs are putting into the theater which adds a lot of ambient reverb drowning out the original signal.
But the advantage that sound from the short official video has over the sound for the complete version is that it's more even, as the latter, while sounding clearer without the ambient reverb, obviously takes its sound from a terribly balanced front-of-house output line, which seems like it combines both disadvantages of highly directed mics (so whenever a mouth moves only an inch left and right from its mic, it's nearly inaudible) with a truly asinine compression setup where every sound being only slightly louder than a stupidly low set threshold, immediately results in the particular mic sound becoming nearly inaudible for what seems like 10 seconds at a time before slowly fading back in.
Guess I'll spend the next few hours cleaning up the sound of both. The short official version will be easier because all that can be done with it is de-noising it, whereas the complete version will require much more work after de-noising (that is by trying to raise all the gaps from the asinine compression setup to a normal level), but will hopefully result in a better version because it lacks the drowning ambient reverb the short official video has. And tomorrow, I'll try to mix both videos into one by taking the best of each.